Skip to main content

All too often, military operations are planned and conducted without a clear understanding of the political endgame expected to occur on the adversary’s side, or by simply assuming rational calculation. Clausewitz states that war is the continuation of policy by other means, yet policymakers do not always articulate how they believe military operations will lead towards the desired political end state. Instead, the end state is left in military terms; with the result that military operations can achieve every stated objective condition, yet the policy aims remain unfulfilled. This is a two-part problem, one theoretical and one practical, and both are interlinked, The theoretical problem is the lack of a mental framework tying the desired end state (usually broadly stated) to the activities undertaken with the instruments of national power. This is a “theory of victory,” which describes how the instruments, properly utilized, have effects which lead to reactions and ultimately to particular political endgames within the adversary’s political system. The practical problem is tracking the many activities contained in a plan to establish that they have some logical linkage to the ultimate end. Military plans are immense. The implied logic behind every activity is not always obvious, and it strains credulity to believe that planners can be sure they are not working at cross-purposes. Yet, just as planners must do the thinking, surely tools beyond word processors can be provided to help them with mindless task tracking. This thesis establishes a theory and tests it against the real word, ties it to a practical tracking methodology, and examines one possible means to assist planners in examining the logic they express. 

Read the document here.


Cite Article
(P McDonnell, 2009)
P McDonnell, J. 2009. 'National Strategic Planning: Linking DIMEFIL/PMESII To A Theory for Victory'. Available at: (Accessed: 15 April 2024).
(P McDonnell, 2009)
P McDonnell, J. 2009. 'National Strategic Planning: Linking DIMEFIL/PMESII To A Theory for Victory'. Available at: (Accessed: 15 April 2024).
John P McDonnell, "National Strategic Planning: Linking DIMEFIL/PMESII To A Theory for Victory", The Forge, Published: June 12, 2009, (accessed April 15, 2024).
Download a RIS file to use in your citation management tools.

Defence Mastery


This web site is presented by the Department of Defence for the purpose of disseminating information for the benefit of the public.

The Department of Defence reviews the information available on this web site and updates the information as required.

However, the Department of Defence does not guarantee, and accepts no legal liability whatsoever arising from or connected to, the accuracy, reliability, currency or completeness of any material contained on this web site or on any linked site.

The Department of Defence recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to their use of this web site and that users carefully evaluate the accuracy, currency, completeness and relevance of the material on the web site for their purposes.

Related Articles

1 /4