Skip to main content

Inclusivity and diversity are not about wokeness or being politically correct – they are the opposites of exclusivity and homogeneity.

Your old road is rapidly agin'
Please get out of the new one
If you can't lend your hand
For the times they are a-changin'

Bob Dylan, ‘The Times They Are A-Changin’ ‘

I thoroughly enjoyed Jason Gardner’s excellent satirical work describing how to create an inclusive ADF by instituting what would better be described as ‘thought police’ – satire is a dying art, and well-written satire is particularly effective at encouraging critical discussions. And in perhaps a fine exhibition of wokeism, I’ve risen to the bait that James has laid out so well to try and bring a different perspective to what ‘inclusivity’ and ‘diversity’ mean.

‘Inclusivity’, to me, is about allowing people to be themselves within the organisation’s structure, requirements and processes. ‘Diversity’ is about not having anybody that looks or thinks like you.

I take Jason’s point that the ADF is a warfighting organisation that exists to defend the nation through the application of lethal force, and that this is independent of any political correctness. I would suggest, though, that to defend Australia in this day and age means that the ADF needs to be able to recruit and retain the very best from Australian society – in other words, to be ‘an employer of choice’. The demographics of the ADF suggest that perhaps we are not.

I’m not saying that we need a quota system so that the demographic composition of the ADF is rigidly aligned with the demographics of the Australian population as a whole. But as James rightly points out, we are overwhelmingly white, male, and with values broadly informed by the Judeo-Christian origins of our society.

The fact that males comprise 80.5% of the ADF but only 49.3% of the Australian population suggests that there may be talented, intelligent female and non-binary Australians who aren’t considering the ADF at all. Likewise, the overwhelmingly Anglo background (exact numbers are a little hard given how ancestry statistics are collected, but 91% of the ADF speak English exclusively) would indicate that the 24% of Australians who have a different ancestry (including the 16% of all Australians who have Asian ancestry) aren’t actively considering careers in the ADF.[1]

Like Jason points out, political correctness has no place in warfighting. But in the same vein, success in conflict demands that our best and brightest do serve, regardless of whether or not they’re white, male, and Judeo-Christian; if we cannot compel them to do so, then we should at least attempt to attract them into the uniform.

Inclusivity therefore isn’t about forcing us to be absolutely neutral in our language and thought so that every phrase uttered incorporates the totality of humanity. But it does mean removing, where reasonable, those practices which may preclude any given individual from wishing to apply for the ADF because their individual needs cannot be met. I’ve yet to see any complaints about vegetarian ration packs and mess meals being offered to cater for the 12% of Australians who routinely or only eat vegetarian food. Perhaps this is because vegetarian food can be thought of as ‘food with the meat removed’, which means that anybody can eat it. So, in a similar vein, why the opposition to the provision of secular spiritual care, which is just spiritual care with the Judeo-Christian removed? If it includes more people while achieving the same outcome, then that sounds like a win to me. And just as the inclusion of vegetarian meals didn’t remove meat options, secular spiritual care shouldn’t remove Christian, Hindu, Buddhist, Islamic or any other spiritual options either.

Inclusivity isn’t an end in and of itself; it’s a necessary prerequisite to building diversity.  While the benefits of diversity, particularly for a military, have been covered at depth in a variety of publications, a sentence from this article Task & Purpose resonated with me: ‘By just making a bigger effort to broaden the pool of applicants we select from, we have the ability to increase, not decrease, quality’. Increasing the diversity of the ADF, both what we look like and how we think, isn’t about erasing any given set of identities in order to only promote a select few. But visible diversity encourages a wider audience to consider joining, and a larger pool of candidates helps ensure that we are actually recruiting the best and brightest.

It can be confronting having to give up space to share the spotlight with others, particularly when it’s mandated by the organisation without a clear explanation. But it’s not a zero-sum game; empowering others doesn’t mean disenfranchising yourself[2]. Nobody should be denying the successes of any who served before us simply because a given individual was of a particular ethnicity or gender. But if me acknowledging the heroism of CPO Buck Rogers is apparently devoid of any political correctness, then a white male acknowledging the service of Lens Waters or Billy Sing should surely be the same. It’s your legacy too, after all.

Like Jason, I’ll also borrow a Soviet phrase. Leon Trotsky, the founder of the Red Army, told a rival faction that they should ‘go where you belong from now on – into the dustbin of history’. The times they are a-changin’, friends, and you’d best get informed and on board. Otherwise, you’ll also be consigned to the dustbin of history.

Footnotes

[1] Statistics taken from the 2016 Australian Census and the 2019 Defence Census

[2] If in doubt, refer to Principle 7 of the ADF leadership principles, ADF-P-0 ADF Leadership

00
Cite Article
Harvard
APA
Footnote
RIS
(Jiang, 2022)
Jiang, O. 2022. 'An Inclusive ADF Or The Dustbin of History?'. Available at: https://theforge.defence.gov.au/article/inclusive-adf-or-dustbin-history (Accessed: 21 April 2025).
(Jiang, 2022)
Jiang, O. 2022. 'An Inclusive ADF Or The Dustbin of History?'. Available at: https://theforge.defence.gov.au/article/inclusive-adf-or-dustbin-history (Accessed: 21 April 2025).
Oliver Jiang, "An Inclusive ADF Or The Dustbin of History?", The Forge, Published: January 18, 2022, https://theforge.defence.gov.au/article/inclusive-adf-or-dustbin-history. (accessed April 21, 2025).
Download a RIS file to use in your citation management tools.
Defence Technical Social

Comments

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Department of Defence or the Australian Government.

This web site is presented by the Department of Defence for the purpose of disseminating information for the benefit of the public.

The Department of Defence reviews the information available on this web site and updates the information as required.

However, the Department of Defence does not guarantee, and accepts no legal liability whatsoever arising from or connected to, the accuracy, reliability, currency or completeness of any material contained on this web site or on any linked site.

The Department of Defence recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to their use of this web site and that users carefully evaluate the accuracy, currency, completeness and relevance of the material on the web site for their purposes.